Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:05

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why is there a housing crisis in Europe?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The doctor said 'be happy.' Music therapy can help cancer patients do that - NPR
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Scientists hooking flies on cocaine to study addiction: Reports - WKRN News 2
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What makes someone feel "rich enough" in different societies?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Why is there so much hate against black people?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
If Donald Trump becomes the President, will it affect the jobs for Indians in IT sector?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Popular sugar substitute erythritol may impair brain blood vessel health, study finds - PsyPost